The drugs were starting to take effect for Joe (how's that for an opener?) so we decided to follow our original plans for Wednesday and do a little touring. After breakfast at Mickey Fine's (yes, again) we drove Santa Monica Blvd., through at least part of Hollywood, and north to Griffith Park. My dad had recommended a stop at the Autry National Center for the American West.
Movie cowboys? I'm there! (And yes, my fellow Pennsylvanians, Tom Mix got a nod.) But the Autry Center is far more than cinematic thrills. One side of the museum was the permanent display, the history of cowboys on film, with costumes, stories, and moving pictures! Even a place where you could sit on a saddle and pretend you were galloping across the range chasing bad guys while your friends saw you on a TV screen! The setup is scaled for a child, but that's not why I didn't do it. I just didn't have the heart to push out the guy in front of me (yes, close to my age); he was just having too much fun.
Exhibits on the other side of the museum change. When we visited (and through May 10) is "Bold Caballeros and Noble Bandidas," a history of the 1910 Mexican revolution that debunks every stereotype I ever heard about Pancho Villa. This museum does not make my list of good small museums, but that's because it's not small. Most definitely a great place to see.
We enjoyed the Autry Center but had to leave before we saw everything because we had one more stop planned for the day and I wanted to make sure we didn't miss it. The last tour of the day at the Hollyhock House, Frank Lloyd Wright's early 1920s' Los Angeles effort, was supposed to start at 3:30.
While Joe and I were building the home we live in, we studied FLW's Usonian concept of organic architecture. It means simplicity of materials and design, done in an economical fashion. We've been to three other FLW homes--Fallingwater, Kentuck Knob, and the Pope-Leighey House (but that's for another article). So we know what's Wright. The Hollyhock House was built for former Pennsylvanian Aline Barnsdall, who saw it as both her home and a center for artists.
As I said, the tour was supposed to start at 3:30. It was 3:45 before our guide came out of the house with the previous group. She started by taking our tickets and then launched right into the story of Wright's mistress's murder. That seemed like an odd way to start a tour, but I thought she'd move on to a more logical narrative. That didn't happen. She did talk about him being in Japan around the time the house was designed, though, and that he was just finding his place in architecture.
We moved into the house and she was talking but we could not follow what she said. There was little discussion of Wright's principles and design, and what she said about Barnsdall didn't seem to be relevant (the woman wanted a family and a baby, but that didn't happen? I think that's what she said, but then upstairs she referred to the baby's room). She mentioned another architect, someone she said was well known in Los Angeles, and said he had worked on the house, too, but I don't know what kind of input he had, working on the design or overseeing construction or who knows what. From the tour I only know that he and Wright had a falling out and never spoke again.
When we passed a bucket and tarp in the hallway, I thought for sure she'd give us the "every roof in every FLW house leaks. This is what we call a 'one-bucket' house." But instead when someone asked her about it, she threw up her arms and said, "It wasn't right when it was built, it's not right now, we'll be fixing it forever!" as though talking about her own home and an absent contractor, not a landmark building and a highly respected American architect.
The house has some features that are clearly Wright--furniture, windows, doors. Because I've now seen it, I want to find something to read in detail about the design and the building, to interpret what I've seen. I know Wright and Barnsdall had a contentious relationship, but she didn't explain that as part of the history. What did he think of the house? What elements did he use in other places? I don't usually write negative things in a travel piece; if I have a bad experience, I just don't mention a place. Maybe our guide was just having a bad day. But Hollyhock House is part of our architectural history and not very well known in the East. I think people should see it, so I do recommend a visit. But maybe you should read up on the place before you go.
We left feeling pretty dejected, drove back to Beverly Hills, and started to look for a dinner spot. We were hoping to go to Cafe Flore, which the website that recommended Mickey Fine's had mentioned, but it was New Year's Eve and the cafe was closed. Most restaurants were, it turned out. So we drove around until we found an Italian place that was open. I parked the car and as we started walking, we passed another restaurant that looked open. One look at the menu for Aram Restaurant, specializing in Persian food, and we were sold. Joe had lamb, I had chicken and beef kabobs, both with grilled tomatoes and mounds of beautiful white rice accented with saffron rice. We were alone in the restaurant (no one eats at 6:30 on New Year's Eve except East Coast people with sinus infections who didn't have lunch and have to get up very early the next day for the Rose Bowl Parade!), but the staff was very attentive and we enjoyed our dinner. We finished the meal with some traditional Persian desserts (sweet!) and hot tea. It was a very nice ending to a long, uneven day.